Amazon software engineer Aditya Iyer sits alone on steps outside the company headquarters, and across the street from his apartment building, as he works on his laptop Friday, March 20, 2020. Most workers in the area are working from home and people in the state are being asked to maintain physical distance from others to help stop the spread of COVID-19. The death toll in Washington state from the coronavirus increased to 74 a day earlier, and the number of cases topped 1,300, according to state health officials. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

Tech companies want Alta. premier to wade into battle over ‘software engineer’ title

Canadian tech companies are calling on the new premier of Alberta to intervene after a regulatory group’s legal action over job titles such as “software engineer.”

More than 30 signatories of a letter sent to Danielle Smith on Friday say the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) “has taken the aggressive position that software engineers must be regulated, and subject to onerous, restrictive, and unnecessary certification requirements.”

The signatories, which include executives from Helcim, Aimso and Neo Financial, see “software engineer” as a standard job title for anyone building technical programs and argue APEGA shouldn’t be treating it as a role in need of certification and regulation like professional engineers.

“APEGA is actively targeting companies in Alberta with legal action to restrict us from using globally competitive job titles and descriptions,” reads the letter orchestrated by the Council of Canadian Innovators (CCI), a national tech advocacy organization.

The signatories cite APEGA lawsuits against tech companies that use variations on the engineer title. They want Smith to “act and remove the regulatory red tape” they say hampers their ability to compete for global tech talent, which has long been lured to the U.S. instead with promises of big job titles and even bigger salaries.

“Some companies have considered relocating because they find this red tape extremely challenging to deal with and will need to hire more engineers,” says CCI President Benjamin Bergen.

“You’ll see companies open offices in other jurisdictions where they actually use the correct terminology.”

He argues this is a case of a regulator which has “overstepped” on an issue that hasn’t seen this level of action anywhere else in the world.

APEGA’s website says it has “the legal right and requirement” to restrict the practice and use of titles linked to engineering and geoscience to licensed individuals and companies.

On top of traditional titles like professional engineer, professional geologist and professional geophysicist, it says those who are unlicensed cannot use the word engineer combined with any name, title, description, letter, symbol or abbreviation that implies they are licensed with APEGA in job titles, on resumes or on social media.

APEGA maintains this is because “the public may believe that you have the right to practice engineering or geoscience” and “this can endanger public safety.”

An open letter signed by the leaders of each provincial and territorial engineering regulator in Canada in July said use of “software engineer,” “computer engineer” and other information technology titles with the engineer suffix is prohibited everywhere in Canada unless the person using it is licensed by one of their regulatory groups.

Engineers Canada, the national body for the provincial and territorial associations, also points out on its website that there is legal precedent on the matter. An Alberta judge ordered an injunction against someone not registered with APEGA who was using “software engineer” online in 2019.

The licensing of workers is common in many professions, including the legal and medical fields, because it’s seen as crucial to keeping workers ethical and competent when public safety is at risk. However, it is seldom, if ever, used to regulate those in the tech sector, including workers who build apps and other software and hardware.

“Talent is absolutely the most important input to our future success and our ability to attract and retain talent is critical … so if we’re going to have regulators creating a hostile environment for companies … we can’t be competitive,” says Sam Pillar, chief executive of Jobber.

When his Edmonton-based home services platform first heard from APEGA about its use of engineering titles, he says it put disclaimers on its website to differentiate its workers from the positions APEGA regulates. Later, Jobber was sued by APEGA in December 2021.

The matter is still winding through court, Pillar said, adding that it’s time for the government to step in because it’s” dragging on” and affecting companies as big as Google and Apple along with small firms in greater need of talent.

A 2019 report from the Information and Communications Technology Council, a not-for-profit organization offering labour policy advice, predicted demand for digitally-skilled talent in Canada would reach 193,000 by 2022 and more than 305,000 by 2023.

A 2020 addendum accounting for COVID-19 forecast that demand would be reduced by nearly 24 per cent and said under new baseline scenarios, the digital economy is expected to experience demand for 147,000 workers by 2022, with total employment reaching nearly two million.

The 2019 government-funded report listed software developers, data scientists and analysts, cybersecurity workers and information technology support specialists among the most in-demand positions.

Be Among The First To Know

Sign up for a free account today, and receive top headlines in your inbox Monday to Saturday.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to sign up
Pop-up banner image