Want a middle class? Follow Alberta’s example

There has been much handwringing over the claimed disappearance of the middle class.

MARK MILKE

There has been much handwringing over the claimed disappearance of the middle class. From a bestselling international tome to domestic tax-and-spend types who think higher taxes will create more middle-income earners, there is no shortage of those who over-focus on redistribution and underestimate the benefits of opportunity.

Alberta created 71,200 new jobs over the past 12 months while Saskatchewan saw a gain of 11,800 jobs. Compare that to a gain of 39,400 in Ontario (a province with a much larger population) and 10,300 new jobs in British Columbia. (The other six provinces lost jobs in the past year.)

As to why Alberta and Saskatchewan are doing so much better, the usual explanation is Alberta (and Saskatchewan) lucked out because of their resources.

Except that dumb luck doesn’t explain it all. Holland, Singapore and Hong Kong have little in the way of natural resources and yet prosper while Nigeria and Russia extract a lot of oil but have very little in the way of a middle class.

At the national level, it is boring but important policy such as a stable currency and domestic peace matter – as well as property rights, the rule of law, a lack of corruption, independent courts, smart but not over-burdensome regulation, an educated population, the size of government relative to the economy, and tax policy – that lead to the creation of prosperity and the formation of the middle class. I don’t have the space to discuss all such factors – any country or province can mess up a natural advantage – but let’s consider only one issue – tax rates – that can be compared across provinces and which has an effect upon wealth creation and thus opportunities and jobs.

Alberta has long had the lowest overall tax burden. For example, a two-parent, one-income family with two kids and employment income of $75,000 pays $3,446 less in total provincial taxes when compared with the same $75,000 couple in Ontario. The same family in Nova Scotia will pay $6,947 more in provincial taxes than if they lived in Alberta.

Alberta’s politicians have also generally and comparatively been smart on what might be called ‘opportunity policy’. Unlike Atlantic Canada, Quebec or Manitoba on taxes, or Ontario on power policy, or Quebec on excessive interference in almost every aspect of its economy, Alberta has not disadvantaged its entrepreneurs.

More proof of this comes from the Canada Revenue Agency. Compared with other provinces, Alberta has the smallest share of people (42.2%) who report income of less than $30,000. Saskatchewan is next (47.4%). The national average is 50.6%, while Ontario’s is 50.1% and Quebec’s is 53%, while half or more tax filers in all other provinces have incomes of less than $30,000.

Now look at income between $30,000 and $100,000 and let’s assume that range as a proxy for the middle class. Fully 45.5% of Albertans fall into that category. Again, only Saskatchewan (45.2%) comes close to Alberta. Ontario has a smaller middle class (42.9%) as does Quebec (42.7%), with the national percentage at 42.9%. Newfoundland and Labrador has the smallest proportion here, with just 39.7% of the population reporting an income between $30,000 and $100,000.

More dramatically, in Alberta 12.2% of the population report incomes of over $100,000. That is almost double the proportion of all Canadians (6.6%), higher than in Ontario (7%) and starkly higher than Quebec where just 4.5% of the population report taxable income above $100,000.

Or put another way, Alberta has less of its population in the very poorest income class and proportionately more in the middle- and high-income cohorts.

And Alberta (and to a lesser degree Saskatchewan) performed this feat with massive in-migration from other provinces and from around the world.

Mark Milke is a senior fellow with the Fraser Institute. His column is distributed through Troy Media.